Protection of Humanitarian Action Series: On Speaking Out

If the audio player above does not load, you can listen to the podcast here.

Deliberate violence against humanitarian practitioners and operations poses an increasingly critical challenge to the humanitarian sector as humanitarian needs continue to grow in many regions of the world. While maintaining access to populations in need, engaging with communities, and delivering life-saving humanitarian assistance, organizations must also take care to protect the safety and security of their staff, and to prevent and mitigate instances of targeted violence. When attacks do occur, however, humanitarian practitioners and organizations often face a difficult tension between the inclination to condemn these violations on the one hand, and the imperative to protect staff and maintain operations and access to affected populations, on the other. For some agencies, advocacy and denunciation provide a central component of work, of testimony and bearing witness. For others, advocacy and campaigning may represent a risk to operations, to ensuring access, or to maintaining critical relationships on the ground.

In this context, we’ll speak with experts and practitioners about the risks and rewards of speaking out against targeted attacks, versus not doing so, and how to better equip organizations and professionals to make such difficult decisions. What hinders organizations from engaging in advocacy efforts on the protection of humanitarian action? What does appropriate and effective advocacy look like? How can humanitarian organizations resist the normalization of violence against humanitarian action, and also uphold their duty of care to affected staff - without exposing staff and partners on the ground to further risks?

Key questions:

  • What are the risks and rewards of speaking out when attacks on aid workers occur?
  • How can humanitarian organizations balance between speaking out against attacks, and protecting affected persons and programs? Besides affected organizations, who else can or should advocate on behalf of the humanitarian community?
  • What methods, tools or policies are needed to inform and facilitate such decision making?
  • What is the most appropriate or effective means of reasserting the protection of humanitarian action, whether individually or collectively?

 

Pauline Chetcuti
Head of Humanitarian Advocacy and Policy,
Action Contre La Faim (ACF) - France
Diederik Lohman
Acting Director, Health and Human Rights Division,
Human Rights Watch (HRW)
Gareth Price-Jones
Senior Humanitarian Policy and Advocacy Coordinator,
CARE International 
Twitter: @GPJGeneva

Resources

 

Add new comment

(If you're a human, don't change the following field)
Your first name.
(If you're a human, don't change the following field)
Your first name.
(If you're a human, don't change the following field)
Your first name.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Allows content to be broken up into multiple pages using the separator: <!--pagebreak-->.
  • Allows breaking the content into pages by manually inserting <!--pagebreak--> placeholder or automatic page break by character or word limit, it depends on your settings below. Note: this will work only for CCK fields except for comment entity CCK fields.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Recent Tweets

Our Sponsor


A Program Of




All materials © 2014 Harvard University


Back to Top

Back to Top